Site icon Epomedicine

Kaplan’s Lesion : Complex Dorsal MCP joint dislocation

What is Kaplan’s lesion?

Metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint dislocation: Complex (Irreducible) Dorsal

Mechanism of injury: Hyperextension injury

Involvement: Usually occurs on border digits (Index > Little finger)

Characteristic position of index finger:

Other features:

What is the difference between simple and complex MCP joint dislocation?

Gerrand CH, Jarrett PM. A dislocated finger. Postgrad Med J. 1998 Apr;74(870):249-51. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.74.870.249. PMID: 9683986; PMCID: PMC2360864.

Simple:

Complex:

What are the X-ray features of Kaplan’s lesion?

A line straight down the shaft of the proximal phalanx should intersect the metacarpal head.

Failure of the line to intersect indicates subluxation or dislocation.

Lateral view –

Other indicators of complex dislocation:

After whom is Kaplan’s lesion named?

The lesion was initially described by Farabeuf in 1876. Barnard had introduced this concept in English literature in 1901.

Dr. Emanuel B. Kaplan described the mechanism of injury, pathoanatomy, clinical features and method of treatemnt of this condition in 1957. In the literature, he is often titled as a legendary anatomist & hand surgeon. He has authored over 100 publications including “Functional and Surgical Anatomy of Hand (1st and 2nd Ed.)” and “Surgical approaches to Neck, Cervical spine & Upper extremity”.1Spinner, R. J., & Dellon, A. L. (2018). Emanuel B. Kaplan, M.D. (1894-1980): A Legendary Anatomist and Hand Surgeon. Clinical Anatomy. doi:10.1002/ca.23245

Other eponyms in his honor:

How common is Kaplan’s lesion?

Earlier, it was thought to be a rare occurence but recently it is often called as an uncommon or more precisely an under-reported injury in Orthopedic practice.

Emanuel B. Kaplan, in his practice of 20 years – encountered only 2 cases.

Le Clerc, in his review of literature from 1883 to 1991, collected only 10 cases.2KAPLAN EB. Dorsal dislocation of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the index finger. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1957 Oct;39-A(5):1081-6. PubMed PMID: 13475407.

Pandiyan, reported 20 cases between 2010 to 2017.3Pandiyan DT, Venkatesan P. An Easy Method to Reduce Complex Second Metacarpophalangeal Joint Dislocation. Int J Sci Stud 2018;5(12):85-87.

What makes the joint irreducible in Kaplan’s lesion?

Kaplan proposed a “noose theory“:

  1. Volar plate entrapped drosally between base of proximal phalanx and metacarpal head
  2. Distal and dorsal: Natatory ligament
  3. Proximal and palmar: Superficial transverse metacarpal ligament
  4. Ulnar aspect: Flexor tendons & pretendinous band
  5. Radial aspect: Lumbricals

Afifi et.al. examined 6 specimens where irreducible MCP dislocation was created in cadaveric hand model using an impact load.4Afifi AM, Medoro A, Salas C, Taha MR, Cheema T. A cadaver model that investigates irreducible metacarpophalangeal joint dislocation. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009 Oct;34(8):1506-1511. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.06.001. They concluded that:

Why traction (in axis of metacarapal) is not used in closed reduction of MCP joint dislocation?

Traction on the affected joint can draw the entire volar plate dorsally converting simple dislocation to complex dislocation. Failure of closed reduction warrants surgery.

Steps of closed reduction when attempted:

  1. Pain management
  2. Flex the wrist to allow relaxation of flexor tendon
  3. Hyperextend the affected digit
  4. Apply pressure to the base of the proximal phalanx until reduction is achieved
  5. Apply splint

Further reading: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2013/0201/p160.html

What are the surgical approaches for management of Kaplan’s lesion?

A. Dorsal approach (Farabeuf):

Becton et al. reported a series of 9 cases – patients treated with volar approach had a sensory loss on radial aspect of injured finger while those treated with dorsal approach had full recovery with normal function.5Becton JL, Christian JD Jr, Goodwin HN, Jackson JG III. A simplified technique for treating the complex dislocation of the index metacarpophalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57(5):698-700.

B. Dorsal percutaneous approach:

Criticism of Dorsal approach:

Longitudinal splitting of volar plate causes:

  1. Delay in recovery
  2. Needs more immobilization
  3. Leads to instability of the joint

But this seems to be only theoretical – studies show no difference in functional outcome.

C. Kaplan’s Volar approach – Triple incision:

Advantage: Volar plate can be repaired.

D. Lateral approach:

Advantages:

Risks: Nerve and vessel injury 7Pereira JM, Quesado M, Silva M, Carvalho JDD, Nogueira H, Alves J. The Lateral Approach in the Surgical Treatment of a Complex
Dorsal Metacarpophalangeal Joint Dislocation of the Index Finger. Case Rep Orthop. 2019 Apr 10;2019:1063829. doi: 10.1155/2019/1063829.
 eCollection 2019. PubMed PMID: 31093396; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6481117.

E. Combined volar and dorsal approach:

May be necessary for late presentation (>3 weeks) 8Dinh P, Franklin A, Hutchinson B, Schnall SB, Fassola I. Metacarpophalangeal joint dislocation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 May;17(5):318-24. Review. PubMed PMID: 19411643.

How is rehabilitation instituted for Kaplan’s lesion?

  1. Immobilization of the joint in 30 degrees of flexion X 2 weeks
  2. Active ROM in removable dorsal extension block splint (to prevent last 10 degrees of extension)
  3. At 4 weeks the splint is used only for protection
  4. At 6 weeks splint is discontinued 9Cuong, P. and Loma, L. (n.d.). Rehabilitation of MP Dislocations. [online] S3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com. Available at: https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/scal-assets/scal-pt-residencyfellowship/04WristandHand%20Region/28Hand-MPDislocations.pdf [Accessed 29 Feb. 2020].

What are the complications of Kaplan’s lesion?

  1. Stiffness
  2. Arthritis
  3. Osteonecrosis of metacarpal head
  4. Premature closure of physis
  5. Digital nerve damage

Exit mobile version