Site icon Epomedicine

Circumferential Periosteal Block (CPB)

Use: Alternative to hematoma block in reduction of distal radius and ulna fractures

Advantage: Providing distance from the fracture hematoma (no theoretical risk of converting closed fracture into open fracture)

Disadvantage: Risk of neurovascular injury on volar surface of forearm

Local anesthetic and volume: 10–15 ml of 1 % plain lidocaine in adults and around 0.2–0.3 ml of 1 % plain lidocaine per kg of body weight (not exceeding 3 mg per kg of body weight in children)

Tageldin, M.E., Alrashid, M., Khoriati, AA. et al. Periosteal nerve blocks for distal radius and ulna fracture manipulation—the technique and early results. J Orthop Surg Res 10, 134 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0277-6 (CC BY 4.0)

Technique under aseptic precautions:

1. Point of infiltration: 6 cm proximal to the wrist joint

2. Injection on lateral/radial side:

3. Injection on volar and dorsal side:

The process is repeated for the ulna with approximately 3 ml of lidocaine solution if there is a concurrent ulnar fracture.

Duration of action required before fracture manipulation: 15 minutes

Further reading:

  1. Lari, A., Jarragh, A., Alherz, M. et al. Circumferential periosteal block versus hematoma block for the reduction of distal radius and ulna fractures: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 49, 107–113 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02078-8
  2. Tageldin, M.E., Alrashid, M., Khoriati, AA. et al. Periosteal nerve blocks for distal radius and ulna fracture manipulation—the technique and early results. J Orthop Surg Res 10, 134 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0277-6
Exit mobile version